Contract Review analyze a contract with AI
Upload a contract - the AI checks the terms, flags risky clauses, and explains complex wording in plain language.
A task from a photo is solved after you sign in
Works right in the browser
All payment methodsReady-made prompts
Examples created by our users
AAnnaMarketer I built a CV for one specific vacancy: reworded my experience around their requirements, gave achievements with numbers. They called me in two days later.
RRomanDeveloper I practised the interview: questions one at a time, with each of my answers reviewed. In the real interview I did not freeze on the weaknesses question for the first time.
SSylviaFreelancer I check client contracts before signing. One time it flagged payment terms of "within 90 days" - we rewrote it before signing.
Why Moleculs.ai
A straightforward way to work with AI
One subscription, one payment
One balance for every model - no separate plan for each service
Works right in the browser
Nothing to install or configure - open a tab and start
All AI models in one place
Text, images, video, and music - all under one subscription
Clear, simple interface
Plain wording throughout the product - no guesswork
Quick start
Sign up in a minute, no complicated setup - straight to work
No access restrictions
Nothing gets blocked - available whenever you need it
What does AI check in a contract?
The AI reviews the document like a lawyer - catching what you might have missed.
Finding risks for you in a contract
Penalties and terms in one list
What to fix before signing
A short digest of the terms
How to check a contract
- Step 01
Describe the task
Fill in the steps: text or photo, role, what to check. Or describe "Contract Review" in one message in the field.
- Step 02
Choose what to get
Choose what to get: "Risks for me", "Penalties and terms" and other options under the field.
- Step 03
Run it and refine
Press "Check the contract". Need another form, such as "Penalties and terms"? Switch the chip and run again. Refine the answer with the buttons under it.
What our users say
Real reviews from our Telegram community
with Moleculs.ai, it's cheaper and faster
with Moleculs.ai you get dozens of models in one subscription, clear limits, and ready-made presets that save you time. It helps you scale content, work as a team, and automate routine tasks without extra costs. All of it faster, simpler, and cheaper than piecing together separate tools.
Choose a plan for your needs
Answers to questions
No, it is a quick review for a first assessment. Agree big deals with a lawyer.
Try Moleculs.ai right now
Describe your task in one field and get a finished result in minutes. Moleculs.ai brings together the best AI models for text, images, video, and voice in a single interface. Start with a free generation, then subscribe for a larger token limit: write text, scale content, and switch between models without juggling extra tools.
What an AI model catches in a contract - and what it doesn't
AI contract review answers one question: where in the text are the terms that will work against you. The model reads the whole document at once, holds every clause in mind simultaneously, and catches what gets lost when you skim it - a reference in clause 9.3 to an appendix that doesn't exist, a deadline counted from an event with no date attached, a penalty written in for only one side.
What AI doesn't do: it doesn't replace a lawyer in a dispute, it doesn't know your correspondence with the other party, and it doesn't check their solvency. It works with the text, not the situation. Its sensible role is the first read-through - a couple of minutes to get a risk map, then take that map to a lawyer or into negotiations without burning their time on the obvious stuff.
Why it's noticeably faster than reading it yourself
A fifteen-page contract takes a person forty minutes to read, and by the end they've forgotten the beginning. An AI model compares clause 12 against clause 3 without getting tired, and the usual traps - a one-sided termination right, auto-renewal, jurisdiction in a city that isn't yours - surface right away, not after the money has already changed hands.
How to ask so the review actually helps
"Check this contract" gets you a summary. A useful answer comes from giving the model your position and your goal.
- Say which side you're on. "I'm the client," "I'm the contractor," "I'm the tenant" - this decides which clause counts as a risk and which one protects you.
- Name what actually matters to you. Deadlines, the acceptance process, liability for delays, the right to walk away unilaterally - the model will prioritize instead of handing you a flat list of thirty remarks.
- Ask for quotes. "For every risk, give me the clause number and the exact wording" - that way you can check the answer instead of taking it on faith.
- Ask about gaps separately. A missing clause is more dangerous than a badly written one: the contract might simply have no termination procedure, no late-payment liability, no confidentiality terms at all.
- Ask for replacement wording. Not "this clause is bad" but "rewrite it like this" - that's what actually goes into a redline you send back.
What's always worth checking
The subject of the contract - is it described precisely enough that both sides will read it the same way six months from now. The price - fixed, or can it be raised unilaterally. Acceptance - is there a deadline after which silence counts as approval. Liability - is it symmetric. Termination - can you walk away, and at what cost. Jurisdiction - whose region does a dispute get heard in.
Which contracts people bring in most often
AI contract checking works the same way on any text, but the typical traps differ by contract type. In a works contract, it's vague acceptance terms and no deadline for raising objections. In a lease, it's how rent indexing works and the terms for early exit. In a services agreement, it's a scope described so broadly it covers almost anything. In a supply contract, it's the moment risk transfers and the return process for defective goods. In an employment contract, it's the probation period and bonus terms that in practice leave the bonus entirely at the employer's discretion.
After the review: what to do with the results
A list of risks doesn't change anything by itself - what matters is what it turns into.
- Split the findings into blockers and nice-to-haves. Out of twenty points, usually only three or four are non-negotiable; trying to fix everything turns the negotiation into a month of back-and-forth.
- Put together a redline. Ask the AI model to format the changes as "clause - current wording - proposed wording" - that's a document you can send straight to the other party.
- Run the next draft through again. When the other side sends back their edits, re-checking the contract with AI is cheaper than reading it line by line - the model shows you what actually changed in meaning, not just in text.
- Keep the review. Six months down the line, if there's a dispute, it helps to remember which risks you accepted knowingly.
Different models give you a different read
All the models are available on one subscription, and it shows on a contract. Claude holds a long document together more carefully and references clause numbers more precisely - good for that first full read-through. ChatGPT is stronger at rewriting: it's better at proposing concrete replacement wording for disputed clauses. It's worth running the same document through both and comparing - a disagreement between them usually points straight at the clause worth raising with a lawyer.
Limitations worth keeping in mind
An AI model analyzes text, not case law in your region, and it can't guarantee a given wording will hold up in an actual dispute. It doesn't notarize anything and takes no responsibility for the outcome. Checking a contract against Russian law with AI is a way to catch the obvious - not a legal opinion from a qualified professional.
One more thing, on data: before you upload anything, it's worth stripping out personal data and commercial details the review doesn't actually need - account numbers, passport details, exact sums, anything that doesn't affect how the terms get evaluated.
